<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Counterintuitive Maths: Part Two</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.divisiblebypi.com/2010/03/12/counterintuitive-maths-part-two/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.divisiblebypi.com/2010/03/12/counterintuitive-maths-part-two/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>An academic atheist sells emu month.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2011 14:08:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Counterintuitive Maths: Part Two &#124; Young Australian Skeptics</title>
		<link>http://www.divisiblebypi.com/2010/03/12/counterintuitive-maths-part-two/comment-page-1/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Counterintuitive Maths: Part Two &#124; Young Australian Skeptics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.divisiblebypi.com/?p=169#comment-41</guid>
		<description>[...] Cross posted from Divisible By Pi. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cross posted from Divisible By Pi. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan B.</title>
		<link>http://www.divisiblebypi.com/2010/03/12/counterintuitive-maths-part-two/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 02:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.divisiblebypi.com/?p=169#comment-34</guid>
		<description>Thanks for bringing this up--it&#039;s even better than the Monty Hall problem as a tool for generating discussion. I&#039;ve always found the controversy fascinating, especially the strange ways the &quot;not equal&quot; crowd contrive for proving their side. It makes an excellent example for why we need rigor in mathematics.

I&#039;m currently teaching Calc II (for the first time) and you&#039;ve given me a good idea--we&#039;ll be starting sequences and series in a few weeks. Maybe I&#039;ll bring up the question of whether 0.999… = 1 and let the class have at it, then return to the question a few classes later when we cover geometric series.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for bringing this up&#8211;it&#8217;s even better than the Monty Hall problem as a tool for generating discussion. I&#8217;ve always found the controversy fascinating, especially the strange ways the &#8220;not equal&#8221; crowd contrive for proving their side. It makes an excellent example for why we need rigor in mathematics.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m currently teaching Calc II (for the first time) and you&#8217;ve given me a good idea&#8211;we&#8217;ll be starting sequences and series in a few weeks. Maybe I&#8217;ll bring up the question of whether 0.999… = 1 and let the class have at it, then return to the question a few classes later when we cover geometric series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

